Have we learned any lessons from Nagasaki?

Nagaski Memorial-flickrThe Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has put together an extraordinary series of documents, Nagasaki 71 Years Later, examining the second atomic bombing of Japan by the United States, on August 9, 1945:

In many ways, Nagasaki is a more realistic – and thus alarming – case study of what a modern nuclear strike might look like. Hiroshima was considered an ideal military target: a medium-size population center that had been untouched by conventional weapons with a sizable troop concentration.

Nagasaki, on the other hand, had no major troop concentration….

If Hiroshima was bombed to prove there was a nuclear weapon, Nagasaki was bombed to prove there were more. In this way, Nagasaki encapsulates the horrifying reality of a nuclear-armed world and the false narrative of the ideal first strike.

Please take a look at this special collection of articles amassed by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists commemorating the 71st anniversary of the only atomic bombings in history.  Click here.


For those who have not yet signed it, please click here to call on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to lead internationally on nuclear disarmament.

Photo credit: Sam Ward


Tags: Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Atomic bomb, Canadian foreign policy, Ceasefire.ca, CNANW, Effects of nuclear war, Hiroshima, International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Japan, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 71st Anniversary, NATO nuclear policy, NPT, Nuclear abolition, Nuclear Bomb, Nuclear disarmament, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Nuclear Weapons Convention, Nuclear Weapons Policy, nuclear-armed states, Rideau Institute, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, United States, United States Government, WWII